Remove Ads

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Harry Potter Movie
#11
i heard it sucked and it only the first 20 mins was good
Reply
#12
Actually, I'd say the last 30 minutes instead.

But really..., Lovegood actress keep me awake for the whole movie.
Reply
#13
Umbridge's actress was really good for the part... she kinda looked like Jim Carrey...
Reply
#14
It was shite i just downloaded it ^^ in the words of some simpsons chara "only saps pay for movies*
Reply
#15
Ya the movie was a bit of a disapointment for those who are big HP fans they rushed the Beginning and End of the Movie. They didnt explain what the Veild was and i really wanted to see more of the Department of Mysteries
Reply
#16
i thought it was pretty good -- i mean, check out all those effects! Big Grin it did feel a bit rushed, too.
but as i always say.. the movies will never be as good as the books. [: overall though, i'd say it was the best of the five.
Reply
#17
So I went to see the movie yesterday and it was a dissapointment... it could have been 10 x more depressing and it wasnt...:grin:
Reply
#18
i just dun really understand the movie until i watch it 2 or 3 times =.=...and yea i dun read the books..
Reply
#19
Blaze Wrote:i just dun really understand the movie until i watch it 2 or 3 times =.=...and yea i dun read the books..

lol! you really wont understand it if you havent read the book<
there are many changes made in the movie, and if youre an avid reder, you will just be dissaponted because of those changes!
Reply
#20
oic...and yea i thought Goblet of Fire was pretty good..atleast better than Order of the Phoenix >.>
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Simpsons Movie. SilverKunai 49 4,209 08-01-2007, 10:10 AM
Last Post: V-en
  Harry potter 7 Draik 80 10,103 07-26-2007, 08:48 AM
Last Post: AzN

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)